Main Page: Difference between revisions

Adding STAR voting to the homepage, and expanding the top bullet list a little bit.
m (Changed protection level for "Main Page": High traffic page: Vandalism on high traffic Main Page. Increasing protection to autoconfirmed for indefinitely. Steward action ([Edit=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (indefinite) [Delete=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (indefinite)))
(Adding STAR voting to the homepage, and expanding the top bullet list a little bit.)
Line 5:
== About ==
:''main: [[About]]''
Different [[Electoral system|electoral systems]] have different effects on the quality and timbre of democratic elections. There arehave movementsbeen aremany formingactivists aroundworking electoralto reformreplace the broken "choose-one" system used in many jurisdictions (where "choose-one" is often referred to as "[[first-past-the-post]]"). For example, there are movements for
 
* [[Proportional representation]] systems, and methods which use similar [[Ranked voting systems|ranking systems]], such as "[[Instant-runoff voting]]" (frequently promoted as "Ranked Choice Voting")
* [[Proportional representation]]
* [[Approval voting]] - A simple "choose-many" variation of "choose-one" systems
* [[Score voting]] and [[cardinal voting systems]]
* [[STAR voting]] - a variation on score voting which treats each voter's preferences as a ranking in the final elimination round of the election
* [[Instant-runoff voting]]
* [[Condorcet method|Condorcet methods]] - systems which ensure that the "pairwise winner" of voters' aggregate preference rankings wins the election
 
There is a vast literature on the [[:Category:Voting theory|theory]] behind these systems, and this raises questions: