Talk:Smith//IRV

The double-slash notation needs to be explained somewhere. Maybe one centralized place for all such articles? — Psephomancy (talk) 19:41, 27 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Agreed, but no idea where to place it. We could explain the notation somewhere in the article for Condorcet methods, and maybe create a "Artificial Condorcet methods" category to handle all the Condorcet// and Smith// methods. BetterVotingAdvocacy (talk) 20:20, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

As a side-note, I think it'd generally be a good policy to try to write up who would win in various Smith-efficient methods when the Smith set has 3 candidates (unless it's obvious, like with Smith//Score), since that's the most common case when there's no CW. BetterVotingAdvocacy (talk) 20:39, 27 February 2020 (UTC)