Electowiki talk:Discourse server for Center for Election Science

Should this be an article?
There isn't anything else to say about a forum other than a link to it, so this shouldn't be an article of its own. It should just be a link from the CES article, or from the Voting links article, or both. — Psephomancy (talk) 20:22, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I'd point to how, with the article for r/EndFPTP, I added a mention of how you can see deleted comments with removeddit; maybe something like that could be added to this article later on as well. BetterVotingAdvocacy (talk) 21:22, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * That's still not going to be more than a sentence, though. It should just be in CES. — Psephomancy (talk) 23:59, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Many more thoughts related to Electowiki editorial policy and my thoughts on working with anonymous editors over on Electowiki_talk:EPOV -- RobLa (talk) 22:59, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
As many of you know, the C4ES discourse.org server is going to be disabled at the end of July. I wanted to note that I moved the C4ES Election-Theory Forum over to Project:C4ES discourse.org server. It's tempting to fool around with this wiki and see about enabling a namepsace on this wiki dedicated to discussion using the wysiwyg discussion tool (that used to be called "Flow"... I can't remember that they call it now. Thoughts? -- RobLa (talk) 04:32, 29 June 2020 (UTC)