| Display title | Cardinal voting systems |
| Default sort key | Cardinal voting systems |
| Page length (in bytes) | 22,702 |
| Page ID | 77 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 12 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | imported>Homunq |
| Date of page creation | 16:39, 18 June 2013 |
| Latest editor | RobLa (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 02:34, 28 April 2022 |
| Total number of edits | 60 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 9 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Cardinal voting methods, aka evaluative, rated, graded, or range methods, are one of the major classes of voting. They are ones in which the voter can evaluate each candidate independently on the same scale to cast a Cardinal ballot. Unlike some ranked systems, a voter can give two candidates the same rating or not use some ratings at all if they desire, and skipped ratings can affect the result. |
