Information for "Independence of Smith-dominated alternatives"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Basic information

Display titleIndependence of Smith-dominated alternatives
Default sort keyIndependence of Smith-dominated alternatives
Page length (in bytes)4,357
Page ID1778
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page1
Counted as a content pageYes
Number of subpages of this page0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects)

Page protection

EditAllow all users (infinite)
MoveAllow all users (infinite)
DeleteAllow all users (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorBetterVotingAdvocacy (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation07:16, 22 February 2020
Latest editorRobLa (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit09:30, 16 May 2021
Total number of edits7
Total number of distinct authors3
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days)2
Recent number of distinct authors1

Page properties

Transcluded template (1)

Template used on this page:

SEO properties



Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
Independence of Smith-dominated alternatives (ISDA), also sometimes called Smith-IIA (Smith-Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives), says that if one option (X) wins an election, and a new alternative (Y) is added, X will still win the election if Y is not in the Smith set. ISDA implies Smith and thus Condorcet, since logically speaking, if an ISDA-passing method's winner were not in the Smith set, eliminating everyone outside of the Smith set would have to change the winner. Some Condorcet methods (e.g. Schulze) satisfy ISDA.
Information from Extension:WikiSEO