Information for "Method evaluation poll 2008"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Basic information

Display titleMethod evaluation poll 2008
Default sort keyMethod evaluation poll 2008
Page length (in bytes)2,784
Page ID278
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0
Counted as a content pageYes
Number of subpages of this page0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects)

Page protection

EditAllow all users (infinite)
MoveAllow all users (infinite)
DeleteAllow all users (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorimported>KVenzke
Date of page creation17:58, 27 December 2007
Latest editorPsephomancy (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit04:21, 12 February 2019
Total number of edits6
Total number of distinct authors3
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

SEO properties



Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
Please rate the following single-winner methods on a scale from 0 to 10, on functional merit alone. That is, leaving the issue of public salability aside, how well will the method perform in a large, contentious electorate? Decimal ratings are allowed.
Information from Extension:WikiSEO