Difference between revisions of "Support Accept Reject Abstain voting"

no edit summary
imported>Homunq
(blurb for accept/abstain)
imported>Homunq
!Support
!Accept
!Reject<br><50
!Abstain
!Reject<br><50
!score<br>>50
|-
|!bgcolor="#fff"|0Cutoff<br>(must be)
|bgcolor="#fff"|42
|bgcolor="#fff"|42
|bgcolor="#fcc"|58
|bgcolor="#fff"|<50
|bgcolor="#fff"|>50
|-
!bgcolor="#fff"|Memphis
|bgcolor="#fff"|42
|bgcolor="#fff"|0
|bgcolor="#fcc"|58
|bgcolor="#fff"|0
|bgcolor="#fcc"|58
|bgcolor="#fff"|(84)
|-
!bgcolor="#fff"|Nashville
|bgcolor="#fff"|26
|bgcolor="#fff"|0
|bgcolor="#fff"|0
|bgcolor="#fff"|74
|bgcolor="#fff"|0
|bgcolor="#bfb"|52
|-
|bgcolor="#fff"|15
|bgcolor="#fff"|17
|bgcolor="#fff"|42
|bgcolor="#fff"|26
|bgcolor="#fff"|42
|bgcolor="#fcc"|47
|-
|bgcolor="#fff"|17
|bgcolor="#fff"|15
|bgcolor="#fff"|42
|bgcolor="#fff"|26
|bgcolor="#fff"|42
|bgcolor="#fcc"|49
|}
</div>
 
MemphisChattanooga isand explicitlyKnoxville givenboth 0get byunder half a majoritypoint per voter, and isare eliminated. ChattanoogaMemphis andis Knoxvilleexplicitly are both given 0rejected by a majority implicitly, soand they areis eliminated. Nashville remains and wins.
 
If Memphis voters tried to strategize by ratingrejecting Nashville at 0 in the above scenario, it would have no effect. If Chattanooga and Knoxville voterstried couldto protectstrategize againstby supporting each other, this strategyhas ifa 2/3chance of themworking, gavebut Memphis could safely defend Nashville by accepting it. Since Memphis is almost guaranteed to be solidly rejected, this defensive strategy of accepting Nashville is probably a 1good idea.
 
[[Category:Graded Bucklin systems]]
Anonymous user