Difference between revisions of "FBPPAR"

150 bytes removed ,  5 years ago
no edit summary
imported>Homunq
imported>Homunq
Here's the procedure. Note that the two steps with extra indentation (1.1 and 3.1) only rarely matter, so it's best to understand the system without them first.
 
# '''Voters can Prefer, Accept, or Reject each candidate.''' DefaultOn isballots "Reject"which fordon't votersexplicitly whouse do"Reject", notblanks explicitlycount rejectas any"Reject"; candidatesotherwise, andblanks count as "Accept" otherwise.
## For anycandidates candidatea theyvoter preferprefers, votersthey may also checkmark a "stand aside" option. (This ishas rarelyno useful;effect itwhen iscombined onlywith worthwhile"accept" ifor they"reject". thinkIt thatis theuseful candidatefor mightthose becomerare thecases leaderwhen inyou stepprefer 3a candidate, and standthink inthey would be the wayleader ofin astep stronger2, compromisebut leader.)do "Standnot aside"think hasthey nocan effectactually ifwin; itso isthat checkedyou alongthink withyou'd anybe optionbetter otheroff thanif "prefer",voters orlike withyou nocompromise optionmore.
# '''Candidates with overat least 25% Prefer, and lessno more than 50% Rejectreject, are called "viable"'''. The most-preferred viable candidate (if any) with the most non-stand-aside preferences is given the label of leader.
# Candidates get 1 point for every ballot that prefers them.
## When designating the leader (including who counts as "viable" for that purpose only), all "prefer/stand aside" votes count as if they were "reject".
# Candidates with over 25% Prefer, and less than 50% Reject, are called viable. The viable candidate (if any) with the most non-stand-aside preferences is given the label of leader.
# Each "prefer" is worth 1 point. For viable candidates, each "accept" on a ballot which doesn't prefer the leader is also worth 1 point. '''Most points wins.'''
## If the leader would not have been viable counting all "prefer/stand aside" votes as "reject", then the label of leader switches to the next lower viable candidate (if any) in non-stand-aside preferences. Repeat this step as many times as necessary.
# Viable candidates get 1 point for every ballot that accepts them and does not prefer the leader.
# Winner is the highest score.
 
This is largely a theoretical proposal. In real-world elections, the "stand aside" option would probably almost never be useful; certainly not enough to justify the extra complexity.
 
For instance, consider the voting scenarios which meet the following restrictions:
Anonymous user