Add topic
There are no discussions on this page.

It seems to me that the Smith set can be defined simply as the smallest group of candidates such that they have a beatpath to all other candidates, but no other candidates have a beatpath back to them? Why is the beat-or-tie path concept necessary? Edit: Figured it out, if A beats B beats C, with C tying A, then A has a beatpath to C, but C doesn't have a beatpath back, yet C is still in the Smith set. BetterVotingAdvocacy (talk) 05:57, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Return to "Beatpath" page.