3-2-1 voting: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
imported>Homunq
No edit summary
imported>Homunq
No edit summary
Line 1:
In 3-2-1 voting, voters may '''rate each candidate “Good”, “OK”, or “Bad”'''. (Alternately, they may rate one candidate "Good" and leave the rest blank; in this case their chosen candidate's predeclared ratings of the others are used to fill in the blanks.¹) The tallying process has three steps:
 
* Find '''3 Semifinalists''': the candidates with the '''most “good”''' ratings.²
* Find '''2 Finalists''': the semifinalists with the fewest '''"bad" ratings'''.
* Find '''1 winner''': the finalist who is rated '''above the other''' on more ballots (like a virtual runoff).
 
== Footnote ¹: Blank ratings ==
Anonymous user