Anonymous user
3-2-1 voting: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
imported>Homunq No edit summary |
imported>Homunq No edit summary |
||
Line 5:
* Find 1 winner: the finalist who is rated above the other on more ballots.
There are two extra qualifications for semifinalists: their "good" ratings should be more than anyone else in their party (that is, only one semifinalist per party), and at least 15% of the electorate. Usually
== Blank ratings ==
There are two ways to handle blank ratings: "
=== Undelegated 3-2-1 ===▼
For voters who do not explicitly use the "Bad" rating, blank ratings count as "bad". For those who do use "bad", blank ratings count as "OK", except that in step 3 they count as lower than an explicit "OK".▼
=== Delegated 3-2-1 ===
Line 20 ⟶ 16:
When a voter leaves a candidate X blank/unrated, X receives the lowest rating that they got from any candidate that voter rated "Good". So if the voter had rated candidates A and B "good", and both A and B rated X as "OK", then X would get an "OK" from that voter; while if either A and/or B had rated X as "Bad", then X would get a "Bad" from that voter.
▲=== Undelegated 3-2-1 ===
▲For voters who do not explicitly use the "Bad" rating, blank ratings count as "bad". For those who do use "bad", blank ratings count as "OK", except that in step 3 they count as lower than an explicit "OK".
== Tiebreaker ==
|