PAL representation: Difference between revisions

imported>Homunq
No edit summary
imported>Homunq
Line 27:
#* The iteration number is increased by 1. This reduces the quota Q, as if it were the Droop quota for a legislature one seat bigger.
#* The counting process is rerun from scratch, starting with step 3.
# Each district "drafts" one member of each elected party from the elected slate. The draft for each party P proceeds as follows:
#*First, each party P representative is drafted by their home district. (This step is simply a courtesy. Because of ballot design, skipping to the following step would typically give the same results naturally.)
#*From then on, the draft proceeds in descending order of vote proportion. That is, if a greater fraction of the party P votes from district 1 went to candidate A than any other eligible district:candidate pair, then A is drafted to that district. Eligibility is as follows:
#:*The difference between the representative with the most total party P votes in their district, and the one with the least, must be decreased if there is any such drafting option. (Simpler version: No party P representative may be drafted by N+1 districts unless all party representatives have been drafted for at least N. But the simpler version could leave a representative of areas where the party is weak, with much fewer constituents than a representative of areas where it is strong.)
#:*No district may draft two representatives from the same party.
 
Anonymous user