Sequential dropping: Difference between revisions
Category:Condorcet method → Category:Condorcet methods
imported>MarkusSchulze No edit summary |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (Category:Condorcet method → Category:Condorcet methods) |
||
Line 3:
Differs from minmax only in the "that's in a cycle" proviso. As a result of that proviso, sequential dropping is Smith-efficient. Unlike [[Schulze method|Schulze]], [[ranked pairs]], and [[river]], sequential dropping fails monotonicity and clone independence.
[[Category:Condorcet
| |||