103
editsInstant Pairwise Elimination: Difference between revisions
m
→Example: Fix, consistent use of "pairwise loser" which is defined in introduction.
m (/* Example * Refinement edits) 
m (→Example: Fix, consistent use of "pairwise loser" which is defined in introduction.) 

}
In the first elimination round, Memphis is eliminated because it is the
If there had not been a Condorcet loser, Knoxville would have been eliminated (instead of Memphis) because the '''column''' labeled '''over Knoxville''' has the largest sum (193%). If there had been a tie for the largest column sum, then Knoxville would have been eliminated because the '''row''' labeled '''Prefer Knoxville''' has the smallest sum (107%).
}
In the second elimination round, Knoxville is eliminated because it is the
If there had not been a Condorcet loser, Knoxville still would have been eliminated because the '''column''' labeled '''over Knoxville''' has the largest sum (151%). If there had been a tie for the largest column sum, then Knoxville still would have been eliminated because the '''row''' labeled '''Prefer Knoxville''' has the smallest sum of (49%).
}
In the third and final elimination round, Chattanooga is eliminated because it is the
The only remaining candidate is Nashville, so it is declared the winner.
