Difference between revisions of "FBPPAR"
Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Here's the procedure. Note that the two steps with extra indentation (1.1 and 3.1) only rarely matter, so it's best to understand the system without them first.
# Candidates with
▲# Candidates with over 25% Prefer, and less than 50% Reject, are called viable. The viable candidate (if any) with the most non-stand-aside preferences is given the label of leader.
This is largely a theoretical proposal. In real-world elections, the "stand aside" option would probably almost never be useful
For instance, consider the voting scenarios which meet the following restrictions: