Summability criterion: Difference between revisions
Mentioned summability of Ebert's method
No edit summary |
Matijaskala (talk | contribs) (Mentioned summability of Ebert's method) |
||
Line 12:
It's unknown whether it's possible to construct a Droop-proportional method that's summable in <math>O(\log(V) \cdot c^k \cdot s^n)</math> for constant <math>k</math> and <math>n</math>.
[[Ebert's method]] is summable in <math>O(c^2)</math> for any number of seats.<ref>{{cite web | title=proof that sum of squared loads is precinct-summable | date=2020-01-14 | url=https://forum.electionscience.org/t/possible-improvement-to-pamsac-gets-rid-of-cfat/566/19 | access-date=2020-04-29}}</ref>
== Summable methods ==
| |||