Talk:Ranked Pairs: Difference between revisions

Line 6:
 
What the title says. Right now, RP seems to be the "best available" Condorcet system (it's a top-shelf method alongside STAR). Can we make it even better? What's the strongest possible independence of (generalized Condorcet) criterion we could get? (Smaller than Smith, Schwartz, etc.) --[[User:Closed Limelike Curves|Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 19:29, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
: A simple leximax method seems to get us to independence of Landau-dominated alternatives--order candidates by Copeland score, then break ties with ranked pairs. --[[User:Closed Limelike Curves|Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 00:24, 22 February 2024 (UTC)