Talk:STAR voting: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 14:
This might be intentional, though: with something like a 100-point scale, there would be very little difference between being a strategic voter's 1st choice and their 10th choice in the first round, so the coarser scale makes strategic exaggeration harder.
 
Intuitively, the half-star feels like a reasonable compromise, but other people might disagree on how to balance these criteria. (Some people wouldeven prefer toapproval limitvoting, which limits strategic exaggeration even more!) with[[User:Closed approvalLimelike voting!Curves|Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 01:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)