| Display title | Talk:Score DSV |
| Default sort key | Score DSV |
| Page length (in bytes) | 772 |
| Namespace ID | 1 |
| Namespace | Talk |
| Page ID | 3976 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Page views in the past month | 0 |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | Kristomun (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 12:21, 18 May 2024 |
| Latest editor | Kristomun (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 12:21, 18 May 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | User:Closed Limelike Curves, I've reverted your latest change since Quinn defines the method as using the Smith set. In addition, I don't know which properties would be retained and which would be violated by using the essential set instead. Perhaps better is to expand the section on using the essential set, referring to it as a Nash equilibrium for Range (with appropriate cites), and say something like: "thus Score DSV is somewhat DSV but one could argue that using the essential set is closer to its spirit". I'm not sure if Jameson wrote any posts to this effect, or if there was a discussion about it on EM, but if so, they'd make useful references. Kristomun (talk) 12:21, 18 May 2024 (UTC) |
