Talk:Techniques of method design: Difference between revisions
→Cardinal strength: new section
imported>KVenzke No edit summary |
(→Cardinal strength: new section) |
||
Line 4:
I've never heard Schwartz defined as the union of sets. Is it useful to do so? -Kevin Venzke
== Cardinal strength ==
: "Cardinal rated strength = sum of difference in the candidates' cardinal ratings on all ballots which rate the winner over the loser of the defeat. Helps diminishing certain strategies even better, but requires interpersonally comparable cardinal ratings."
Interesting. Any reason this was chosen over the (more intuitive to me) median difference in candidate ratings? This would be positive if most candidates rank A > B and negative otherwise; the decision to treat winning and losing votes asymmetrically seems odd to me. [[User:Closed Limelike Curves|Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 20:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
| |||