User:RodCrosby/QPR2: Difference between revisions
m
→Not PR: para
(→Not PR: Ireland) |
m (→Not PR: para) |
||
Line 174:
PR-Squared does not explicitly seek close proportionality, although simulations indicate that it goes a lot further towards that outcome than FPTP.
Moreover, PR-Squared can deliver more proportional outcomes than some supposedly PR systems! For example, the Welsh Additional Member System has produced Gallagher Indexes of disproportionality in excess of 10% in four out of six elections since 1999. Even higher values can be found in elections to the European Parliament conducted in Ireland under STV.
Simulations suggest that PR-Squared would have delivered Gallagher Indexes of '''''less''''' than 10% in nine out of thirteen elections for the UK parliament since 1974. (and compared to only one under FPTP)
===Declarations===
| |||