Display title | User talk:RobLa/Advocacy draft policy |
Default sort key | RobLa/Advocacy draft policy |
Page length (in bytes) | 946 |
Namespace ID | 3 |
Namespace | User_talk |
Page ID | 1488 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Page views in the past month | 0 |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
Page creator | RobLa (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 01:02, 19 December 2019 |
Latest editor | RobLa (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 01:02, 19 December 2019 |
Total number of edits | 1 |
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Over on Talk:Vote unitarity, there was a suggestion by User:BetterVotingAdvocacy to allow for "some form of counterargument or criticism to be mentioned somewhere". This seems like a good idea. My current plan for this proposal is to bulid out a template for a banner which can be placed on the talk page for every "Advocacy" article where folks that want to add counterpoint articles can do so. -- RobLa (talk) 01:01, 19 December 2019 (UTC) |