2018 Washington 10th CD Straw Poll: Difference between revisions
2018 Washington 10th CD Straw Poll (view source)
Revision as of 00:25, 5 September 2018
, 5 years agoadd summaries
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (add details) |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (add summaries) |
||
Line 1:
[https://www.counted.vote Counted] (which advocates for [[Score voting]]) [https://www.counted.vote/cd10_straw_poll held a straw poll in the 10th Congressional District of Washington on June 30, 2018], after giving candidates a chance to speak in front of the voters.
Ballots included three voting systems: [[First Past the Post electoral system|Plurality/FPTP]], [[Approval voting|Approval]], and [[Score voting|Score]] (0-5), so that voter behavior on the different types of ballots could be compared.
Line 7:
* [https://www.counted.vote/diving_into_our_straw_poll_data_min_max_voting Min/Max voting and use of Score's expressiveness]
* [https://www.counted.vote/diving_into_our_straw_poll_data_subjective_scales Subjectivity of scales and approval thresholds]
Summary of voter behavior:
* 11% of voters [[W:Bullet voting|bullet voted]] (giving the maximum score to one candidate and minimum or blanks to the others).
* 0% of voters anti-voted (giving the minimum score to one candidate and maximum scores to the others).
* 0% of voters min/max voted (approval-style votes, where all candidates get either maximum or minimum scores).
* 42% of voters did not use the full range of scores available.
* Voters did not have the same approval thresholds when converting their score ballots to approval ballots (even with the same score ballots).
[[Category:Elections]]
|