3-2-1 voting: Difference between revisions

tiebreaker
imported>Homunq
imported>Homunq
(tiebreaker)
Line 9:
== Blank ratings ==
 
There are two ways to handle blank ratings: "plainUndelegated", which does its best to infer voter intentions; and "delegated", which makes voting easier for voters by letting them choose to give some of their voting power to their favorite candidate. "Delegated" is suggested unless there are reasons against it.
 
=== PlainUndelegated 3-2-1 ===
 
For voters who do not explicitly use the "Bad" rating, blank ratings count as "bad". For those who do use "bad", blank ratings count as "OK", except that in step 3 they count as lower than an explicit "OK".
Line 20:
 
When a voter leaves a candidate X blank/unrated, X receives the lowest rating that they got from any candidate that voter rated "Good". So if the voter had rated candidates A and B "good", and both A and B rated X as "OK", then X would get an "OK" from that voter; while if either A and/or B had rated X as "Bad", then X would get a "Bad" from that voter.
 
== Tiebreaker ==
 
In all cases, ties are broken by score, with each "Good" counting as 2 points and each "OK" counting as 1. If two candidates are tied in score as well (highly unlikely), the tie is broken randomly.
 
== Motivation for each step ==
Anonymous user