Allocated Score: Difference between revisions
→Variants
Dr. Edmonds (talk | contribs) (→Python Implementation: bugfix) |
|||
| (25 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
[[Allocated Score]] is a
Allocation is the default
== Description ==
[[File:Proportional STAR Ballot - STAR-PR.png|alt=A sample STAR-PR ballot showing scores for each candidate ranging from 0 up to 5 stars. At the top of the ballot are voter instructions, and at the bottom a simple description of how votes are counted.|thumb|A sample STAR-PR ballot]]
Winners in Proportional STAR Voting (Allocated Score) are selected in rounds. Each round elects the candidate with the highest total score and then designates a quota's worth of voters from that candidate's strongest supporters as fully represented. Subsequent rounds include all voters who are not yet fully represented.
== Classification ==
Allocated Score is a [[Cardinal voting systems#Sequential proportional methods|sequential]], [[Multi-Member System|multi-winner]], [[Cardinal voting systems|cardinal]], [[Monroe's method|Monroe-type]], [[proportional representation]] voting method.
==Procedure==
Each voter
# Select the candidate with the highest sum of
# Set the ballot weight to zero for the [[
#* If several voters have
# Repeat this process until all the seats are filled.
[[Fractional Surplus Handling]]: When determining which ballots belong to a winner's quota, voter’s ballots are sorted by the score they contributed to the winner's total score.
When multiple voters contributed the same score to the winner it may be the case that allocating them all to the winner would cause the quota to be exceeded but not allocating them all would cause the quota not to be met. For these voters on the cusp, an equal fraction of their ballot weight is allocated.
Fractional Surplus Handling ensures that voters who supported a candidate equally will be treated equally, while ensuring that the total weight of the ballots allocated for each winner will not exceed the Hare quota. It also preserves the [[Independence of irrelevant alternatives|Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives]] and [[Monotonicity]] criteria.{{Citation_needed}}
Note that with Fractional Surplus Handling voters can have a fractional ballot weight and they can subsequently only contribute that fraction to the remaining candidates, both during subsequent score tabulation and allocation.
Warning: The sort must be done on the weighted score (not the original score from the ballots) or the mismatch between the selection and elimination will cause a free riding issue.<ref>https://forum.electionscience.org/t/system-chosen-by-the-wolf-committee/875/30</ref>
==Python implementation==
Given a Pandas dataframe '''S''' with columns representing candidates and rows representing voters the entries would encode the score of all the ballots. For a max score of '''K''' and a desired number of winners '''W'''.
<source lang="python">
def Allocated_Score(
"""Credit to https://electowiki.org/wiki/Allocated_Score
Allocated Score is another name for STAR-PR
Parameters:
"""
# Normalize score matrix
ballots = pd.DataFrame(ballots.values / max_score, columns=ballots.columns)
# Find number of voters and quota size
voters = ballots.shape[0]
ballot_weight = pd.Series(np.ones(voters), name="weights")
# Populate winners in a loop
winner_list = []
while len(winner_list) <
weighted_scores = ballots.multiply(ballot_weight, axis="index")
# Select winner
winner = weighted_scores.sum().idxmax()
# Add winner to list
winner_list.append(winner)
# remove winner from ballot
ballots.drop(winner, axis=1, inplace=True)
# Create lists for manipulation
cand_df = pd.concat([ballot_weight, weighted_scores[winner]], axis=1).copy()
cand_df_sort = cand_df.sort_values(by=[winner], ascending=False).copy()
# find the score where a quota is filled
split_point = cand_df_sort[cand_df_sort["weights"].cumsum() < quota][
winner
].min()
# Amount of ballot for voters who voted more than the split point
spent_above = cand_df[cand_df[winner] > split_point]["weights"].sum()
# Allocate all ballots above split point
if spent_above > 0:
cand_df.loc[cand_df[winner] > split_point, "weights"] = 0.0
# Amount of ballot for voters who gave a score on the split point
weight_on_split = cand_df[cand_df[winner] == split_point]["weights"].sum()
# Fraction of ballot on split needed to be spent
if weight_on_split > 0:
spent_value = (quota - spent_above) / weight_on_split
# Take the spent value from the voters on the threshold evenly
cand_df.loc[cand_df[winner] == split_point, "weights"] = cand_df.loc[
cand_df[winner] == split_point, "weights"
] * (1 - spent_value)
ballot_weight = cand_df["weights"].clip(0.0, 1.0)
return winner_list
</source>
Line 76 ⟶ 101:
===Quota===
A common variant is to use Droop quotas instead of Hare quotas to mitigate [[
===Sequential Monroe===
Line 82 ⟶ 107:
[[Sequential Monroe]] can be thought of as a variant of [[Allocated Score]] with a change to the selection method.
== History ==
Allocated Score is the natural extension of applying vote allocation to score ballots. While there are a number of variations on the theme that can be done, the Allocated Score method is the simplest which delivers great results. Beginning in 2018, The Equal Vote 0-5 Star Proportional Representation Research Committee spent two years comparing and studying the options at each stage in the tabulation process and ultimately, thanks to the work of Parker Friedland, [[Keith Edmonds]], [[Jameson Quinn]], [[Sara Wolk]], and a number of others, found Allocated Score to be the committee's consensus method, balancing competing considerations while meeting core criteria.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210227125039/https://forum.electionscience.org/t/system-chosen-by-the-wolf-committee/875|title=System chosen by the Wolf committee - Campaigns - Voting Methods Forum|date=2021-02-27|website=web.archive.org|access-date=2023-05-14}}</ref>
== References ==
[[Category:Cardinal voting methods]]
[[Category:Proportional voting methods]]
[[Category:Multi-winner voting methods]]
[[Category:Cardinal PR methods]]
[[Category:Monotonic electoral systems]]
[[Category:Largest remainder-reducing voting methods]]
| |||