Beatpath example 12: Difference between revisions

Beatpath example 12 (view source)

324 bytes added , 2 years ago

20

edits

Revision as of 19:22, 9 August 2006 (view source) imported>DCary (Fix link to beatpath order so it does not try to point to a draft version of the Beatpath article) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 21:20, 15 September 2021 (view source) Casimir (talk \| contribs) (→‎Winner under different methods of ambiguity resolution: Add MMPO and IRV) Tag: Visual edit
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 227: * The Smith set = the set of all candidates. ==Winner under different methods of ambiguity resolution== * Copeland: B * Schulze: B Ranked Pairs: B Borda/Black: B Approval voting/Llull, assuming every ranked candidate is approved: B Minimax(winning votes): H MMPO: E IRV: E * Raynaud (Gross Looser): E and G tie * Plurality: E, H and K tie ==See also== * [[Beatpath]] * [[Beatpath examples 3 \| Examples 3 candidates]] * [[Maximal elements algorithms \| Algorithms to calculate the Schwartz set and Smith set]] * [[Condorcet Criterion \|Condorcet winner]] * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_method#Related_terms weak Condorcet winners] * [[Schwartz set]] * [[Smith set]] [[Category:Elections]]