Beatpath example 12: Difference between revisions

Beatpath example 12 (view source)

300 bytes added , 2 years ago

20

edits

Revision as of 06:06, 2 February 2019 (view source) Psephomancy (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Tag: Visual edit ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 21:20, 15 September 2021 (view source) Casimir (talk \| contribs) (→‎Winner under different methods of ambiguity resolution: Add MMPO and IRV) Tag: Visual edit
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 227: * The Smith set = the set of all candidates. ==Winner under different methods of ambiguity resolution== * Copeland: B * Schulze: B Ranked Pairs: B Borda/Black: B Approval voting/Llull, assuming every ranked candidate is approved: B Minimax(winning votes): H MMPO: E IRV: E * Raynaud (Gross Looser): E and G tie * Plurality: E, H and K tie ==See also== * [[Beatpath]] * [[Beatpath examples 3 \| Examples 3 candidates]] * [[Maximal elements algorithms \| Algorithms to calculate the Schwartz set and Smith set]] * [[Condorcet Criterion \|Condorcet winner]] * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_method#Related_terms weak Condorcet winners]