Beatpath example 12: Difference between revisions
→Winner under different methods of ambiguity resolution: Add MMPO and IRV
(→Winner under different methods of ambiguity resolution: Add Ranked Pairs winner, fix Copeland) |
(→Winner under different methods of ambiguity resolution: Add MMPO and IRV) |
||
Line 234:
* Borda/Black: B
*Approval voting/Llull, assuming every ranked candidate is approved: B
*Minimax(winning votes): H
*MMPO: E
*IRV: E
* Raynaud (Gross Looser): E and G tie
* Plurality: E, H and K tie
Line 240 ⟶ 242:
==See also==
* [[Beatpath]]
* [[Beatpath examples 3 |
* [[Maximal elements algorithms |
* [[Condorcet Criterion |Condorcet winner]]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_method#Related_terms weak Condorcet winners]
| |||