CPAR voting: Difference between revisions
Category:Graded Bucklin systems → Category:Graded Bucklin methods
imported>Homunq m (Homunq moved page PARFBC voting to CPAR voting: Doesn't meet FBC) |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 17:
== Criteria compliance ==
PAR voting passes
Doesn't pass the [[favorite betrayal criterion]], see mailing list or talk page for details.
There are a few criteria for which it does not pass as such, but where it passes related but weaker criteria. These include:
Line 77 ⟶ 79:
(If Memphis voters rejected Nashville, then Chattanooga or Knoxville could win by conspiring to reject Nashville and accept Memphis. However, Nashville could stop this by rejecting them. Thus this strategy would not work without extreme foolishness from both Memphis and Nashville voters, and extreme amounts of strategy from the others.)
[[Category:Graded Bucklin
|