Cardinal voting systems: Difference between revisions

m (→‎Vote Aggregation and Tallying Methods: Finish updating "system" to "method")
Line 1:
{{Wikipedia|Cardinal voting}}
 
'''Cardinal voting methods''', aka '''evaluative''', '''rated''', '''graded''', or '''range''' systemsmethods, are one of the major classes of voting. They are ones in which the voter can evaluate each candidate independently on the same scale to cast a Cardinal ballot. Unlike ranked systems, a voter can give two candidates the same rating or not use some ratings at all if they desire, and skipped ratings can affect the result.
 
Cardinal voting is when each voter can assign a numerical score to each candidate. Strictly speaking, cardinal voting can pass more information than the ordinal (rank) voting. This can clearly be seen by the fact that a rank can be derived from a set of numbers provided there are more possible numbers than candidates. Unlike ordinal voting, [[W:Arrow's Impossibility Theorem|Arrow's Impossibility Theorem]] does not apply to cardinal methods. Furthermore, all cardinal methods satisfy the participation criterion.
95

edits