Condorcet method: Difference between revisions

m
Line 8:
== Simple explanation ==
 
If one candidate is preferred by amore majorityvoters overthan all other candidates in(when headcompared one-toon-head contestsone), that candidate is the [[Condorcet Criterion|Condorcet Winner]]. This can be determined through use of ranked or rated ballots. InOn rare occasions, no one candidatethere is preferredno by even half of the voters over all other candidates in one-on-oneCondorcet contestswinner. In that case it is necessary to use some tiebreaking procedure.
 
== Casting ballots ==
Line 68:
* '''[[Schulze method|Schulze]]''' with several reformulations/variations, including '''Schwartz Sequential Dropping (SSD)''' and '''Cloneproof Schwartz Sequential Dropping (CSSD)'''<sup>1</sup>
* '''[[Approval-Condorcet Hybrids]]''', such as '''[[Definite Majority Choice]]''', use an [[Approval Cutoff]] to augment the Condorcet pair wise array. Many believe that such a method would make a good first-round public proposal.
*'''[[Smith//Score]]''' chooses the candidate with the highest summed or average score in the Smith Set. Condorcet//Score chooses the Score winner when no Condorcet winner exists. (ThisThese can only be done with rated ballots, or with ranked ballots modified to include approval thresholds).
 
<sup>1</sup> There are different ways to measure the strength of each defeat in some methods. Some use the margin of defeat (the difference between votes for and votes against), while others use winning votes (the votes favoring the defeat in question).