Condorcet method: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
Line 256:
# The voting procedure for the uk.* hierarchy of Usenet
#[http://www.rsabey.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/rpc/fscc/ Five-Second Crossword Competition]
== Notes ==
One concern with Condorcet methods is that it is very difficult to do [[Pairwise counting|pairwise counting]] for elections with 10 of more candidates, since that is at least (0.5*10*((10-1)=9))=45 pairwise matchups to record the details of. Allowing write-in candidates makes things even more complex. One possible solution would be to have a primary beforehand using a voting method better than [[FPTP]] to pick 5 top candidates, and then only allow voters to rank those top 5. For all other candidates, they'd be able to approve or score each of them. The rated information could then be used to elect someone other than one of the top 5 when the non-top 5 candidates have significantly higher ratings, but otherwise only elect one of the top 5. The primary itself could be made slightly semi-proportional as well. {{fromwikipedia}}
== External links ==
| |||