Condorcet winner criterion: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(→Notes) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 232:
[[Category:Voting system criteria]]
== Outside of voting theory ==
Analogues to the Condorcet criterion have been proposed in non-voting contexts; it appears in many places when discussing how to aggregate ranked information. It has been used to discuss search engine rankings <ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www10.org/cdrom/papers/577/|title=Rank Aggregation Methods for the Web|last=|first=|date=|website=|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=}}</ref> and metasearch <ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/jaa/IS4200.10X1/resources/condorcet.pdf|title=Condorcet Fusion for Improved Retrieval|last=|first=|date=|website=|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=}}</ref>. The concept of a [[Smith set ranking]] (which is sometimes referred to as the "extended/generalised Condorcet criterion") helps structure how the ranking of all options should be, rather than only the winner.
==References==
| |||