Anonymous user
Definite Majority Choice: Difference between revisions
→Procedure 2, [[Range voting]]: Change to 0-99 rating from 0-100. It's easier to implement.
imported>MarkusSchulze No edit summary |
imported>Araucaria (→Procedure 2, [[Range voting]]: Change to 0-99 rating from 0-100. It's easier to implement.) |
||
Line 15:
[[Approval cutoff]] may be deemed too complicated for the voter to understand. An alternative is to use [[Range voting]] to resolve cycles.
# Voters cast [[ratings ballot]]s, rating as many candidates as they like. Equal rating and ranking of candidates is allowed. Separate ranking of equally-rated candidates is provided. Write-in candidates are allowed. Unrated candidates are allowed.
# Ordinal (rank) information is inferred from the candidate rating plus additional ranking. For example, candidates might be rated from 0 to
# Each ballot's ordinal ranking is tabulated into a pairwise array containing results for each head-to-head contest (see [[Definite_Majority_Choice#Tallying_Votes|example]] below). The total rating for each candidate is also tabulated.
# The winner is the candidate who, when compared with every other (un-dropped) candidate, is preferred over the other candidate.
# If no undefeated candidates exist, the candidate with lowest total rating is dropped, and we return to step 4.
Quick example: A:
A>B>C>D=E
{| border="1"
! !! A !! B !! C !! D !! E !! F
|-
! A ||
|-
! B || 0 ||
|-
! C || 0 || 0 || 050 || 1 || 1 || 1
| |||