Direct Party and Representative Voting: Difference between revisions

Fix bullet list
m (Psephomancy moved page Category talk:Single-winner voting systems to Category talk:Single-winner voting methods: Category was moved but talk wasn't (though talk should be moved to an article probably))
(Fix bullet list)
Line 17:
 
Principal outcomes:
* A form of proportional representation is achieved with minimal change to the voting system.
 
* The existing system of single member constituencies is retained.
• A form of proportional representation is achieved with minimal change to the voting system.
* The existing system of electing MPs is retained.• The elections of the MP and the party of government are not conflated, improving voter choice.
 
* There are no safe ‘party’ seats.
• The existing system of single member constituencies is retained.
* Voting in marginal constituencies cannot determine the election of the Government.
 
* Simplicity of voting and counting is comparable with FPTP.
• The existing system of electing MPs is retained.
* Each vote in every constituency makes a difference to the result of the election.
 
* Voting power in parliament is proportional, there is no party bias.
• The elections of the MP and the party of government are not conflated, improving voter choice.
* Frequent revision to constituency boundaries is not required to retain this fairness.
 
• There are no safe ‘party’ seats.
 
• Voting in marginal constituencies cannot determine the election of the Government.
 
• Simplicity of voting and counting is comparable with FPTP.
 
• Each vote in every constituency makes a difference to the result of the election.
 
• Voting power in parliament is proportional, there is no party bias.
 
• Frequent revision to constituency boundaries is not required to retain this fairness.