Electowiki talk:The caucus: Difference between revisions

move some old discussions to an archive
(move some old discussions to an archive)
Line 11:
**First time information about electoral methods and why and when some may be better than others
**Experts looking for well crafted information and in depth information on electoral knowledge
 
== Design ==
 
The design is a work-in-progress. I have added the logo and background images from the main Electorama page. I will continue to update the look-and-feel of the site's default skin to match Electorama, but I'm not a CSS or design wizard. [[User:DanKeshet|DanKeshet]] 14:36, 26 Jan 2005 (PST)
 
== Announcements ==
 
Once this has been announced on the election-methods mailing list and Electorama, I think we should give a chance for the Electorama community to shape it before opening it for wider discussion. We can open it for wider discussion by posting to the appropriate Wikimedia places (Sites that use Wikipedia content; sites that use MediaWiki, etc.), as well as the appropriate voting places. [[User:DanKeshet|DanKeshet]] 14:36, 26 Jan 2005 (PST)
 
== Logo and theme ==
Line 39 ⟶ 31:
 
:I'm not very worried about this until or unless it becomes a problem, but a custom namespace could always distinguish fact from editorial. [[User:DanKeshet|DanKeshet]] 14:57, 31 Jan 2005 (PST)
 
== Our "Village Pump"? ==
 
We should probably have some sort of "Village Pump" type page here. Naming this is always traditionally different on a per Wiki basis, based on the flavor of the Wiki. My proposal would be for "[[Project:Smoke-filled room]]" or perhaps "[[Project:The caucus]]", but regardless, this page should probably be reserved for discussion of the [[Main Page]]. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] 16:02, 6 Feb 2005 (PST)
 
:I've been bold and done it. [[User:DanKeshet|DanKeshet]] 16:50, 9 Feb 2005 (PST)
 
== Problems with software ==
 
:I've run into two problems:
 
#Math isn't working. This is pretty big. The math software requires ocaml v.3.0.6; our provider offers 3.0.4. We can either bug our provider or compile the new version ourselves. As it would be much easier to bug the provider, and take up considerably less space, I prefer that.
#<s>Search isn't working. I'm going to look into this.</s> Search wasn't working because of a tiny bug in the rewrite rules. Fixed and it now seems to work. [[User:DanKeshet|DanKeshet]] 17:20, 9 Feb 2005 (PST)
 
== Categories ==
Line 130 ⟶ 109:
 
Anyway, rather than post something extensive here, I put some more detailed musings on this topic on my user page. Feel free to contact me if you're interested in collaborating on this. Thanks, [[User:Justin Bailey|Justin Bailey]] 16:06, 25 February 2008 (PST)
 
 
== Site stuff ==
 
Hi everyone, I'm the sysadmin for this site. I recently have done some upgrading and spam fighting, which unfortunately didn't play out the way I was hoping. Mea culpa. Simple thinko in my configuration changes this weekend, combined with a lack of testing. Before that, it was a "routine" upgrade gone wrong. Next time, I'll post something here, so that you can at least see what's happening.
 
I'm still reworking the configuration to make things more sustainable, with most of the heavy work this weekend. More later. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 20:26, 11 June 2013 (PDT)
 
:More futzing today. I doing some things to make performance better, and I might reenable QuestyCaptcha (had it before the upgrade). -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 13:23, 16 June 2013 (PDT)
 
== Cleaning up categories ==