File:2D election example with vote splitting and spoiler effect.png: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1:
== Summary ==
This is an example simulation of an election on a 2-dimensional political spectrum (such as the Political Compass, Nolan chart, Pournelle chart, etc.) The voters are the blue dots, and candidates are the red dots, and voters support the candidates who are most similar to them ideologically (nearest distance).
 
* C, a partisan candidate, wins under first-past-the-post voting, since A and B split the votes of the left wing of the electorate.
There are 3000 voters (black dots), 3 candidates (colored dots), and voters vote honestly, supporting the candidates who are most similar to them ideologically (nearest distance).
* A, another partisan candidate, wins under Instant-Runoff Voting ("Ranked-Choice Voting"), after B is eliminated for not having enough first-preference votes, leaving A and C (and A is slightly closer to the center).
* BC, a moderatepartisan candidate, andwins theunder best[[First representative ofPast the averagePost voter,electoral winssystem|first-past-the-post undervoting]], Scoresince VotingA (withand normalizedB ballots),split asthe theyvotes areof the highest-ratedleft overallwing byof the voterselectorate.
* A, another partisan candidate, wins under [[Instant-runoff voting|Instant-Runoff Voting]] ("Ranked-Choice Voting"), after B is eliminated for not having enough first-preference votes, leaving A and C (and A is slightly closer to the center, so more people in the center support A over C).
* B, a moderate candidate, and the best representative of the average voter, wins under [[Score Voting]] (with normalized ballots), as they are the highest-rated overall by the voters. B also wins under [[Condorcet method|Condorcet methods]], as B would beat both A and C in head-to-head elections.