Geographic Open List/Delegated (GOLD) voting: Difference between revisions

imported>Homunq
No edit summary
imported>Homunq
Line 78:
== Technical note: codes for "write-in" (non-local) candidates ==
 
One good way to allow "write-ins" of any non-local candidate would be for each candidate to have a unique three-digitnumeric code. To "write in" a candidate, one could check boxes corresponding to their three-digit code, plus an additional box for their party. These codes could be assigned such that minor "mistakes" in a valid code, such as adding or subtracting one from any digit or exchangingtransposing two adjacent digits, would lead to an invalid code, and one that was dissimilar to all other codes of candidates from the same party. In that way, minor ballot mistakes could be caught and even corrected. (The level of such error correction that is possible depends on the size of the states, but it could be quite good for all but the largest states using three-digit codes. The larger states could choose between a reduced potential for error correction, and using four-digit codes.)
 
Using such a mechanism, a voter could simply "write in" a party but not a specific candidate. This would be considered as a vote for an eliminated candidate for that party, using "partisan" transfer.
Anonymous user