Anonymous user
Improved Condorcet Approval: Difference between revisions
add link
imported>KVenzke mNo edit summary |
imported>KVenzke (add link) |
||
Line 42:
However, it might be more intuitive, and preferred, if t[a,b] were defined rather as the number of voters ranking ''a'' equal to ''b'' and explicitly voting for both. This requires a change to step #3 only.
==Links==
*[http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2005-May/015951.html First proposal on the EM list (May 18 2005)]
[[Category:Single-winner voting systems]]
| |||