Justified representation: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Add Category:Types of representation)
No edit summary
Line 1:
Sorry this is a bit of a work in progress. Need to transfer from linked papers
 
 
[[File:Justified Representation.png|thumb]]
 
==Justified representation==
Line 23 ⟶ 26:
| [[w:Sequential_proportional_approval_voting|Sequential Proportional Approval Voting]] || No || No || No || in P
|-
| Example[[Ebert's Method]] || Example Yes|| ExampleNo || ExampleNo || ExampleNP-hard
|-
| Example[[Sequential Phragmen]] || Example Yes|| ExampleNo || Example Yes|| Examplein P
 
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|}
 
Line 35:
==Comparison==
 
Every winner set that provides [[Perfect representation]] also provides [[Justified representation | Proportional Justified Representation ]] <ref> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308022665_Some_Notes_on_Justified_Representation </ref>. In contrast, [[Justified representation | Extended Justified Representation ]] may rule out all winner sets that provide perfect representation. <ref>https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.8269</ref> It is easily seen that PJR is a weaker requirement than EJR, and a stronger one than JR. A method satisfying EJR also satisfies PJR, and that a method satisfying PJR also satisfies JR.
The following
 
==References==
765

edits