Later-no-harm criterion: Difference between revisions

The Condorcet criterion is incompatible with LNH, so it can't be equated 100% with majoritarianism.
No edit summary
(The Condorcet criterion is incompatible with LNH, so it can't be equated 100% with majoritarianism.)
Line 6:
 
<p>'''Later-no-harm''' (usually LNH, but sometimes LNHa or LNHarm to avoid confusion with [[Later-no-help]]) is satisfied by [[IRV|Instant Runoff Voting]], [[Minmax|Minmax(pairwise opposition)]], and Douglas Woodall's [[Descending Solid Coalitions]] method. It is trivially satisfied by [[Plurality voting|First-Preference Plurality]] and [[Random Ballot]], since those methods do not usually regard lower preferences. Virtually every other method fails this criterion.</p>
 
<p>'''Later-no-harm''' is incompatible with the [[Condorcet Criterion|Condorcet criterion]].</p>
 
<h4 class=left>Commentary</h4>
Line 11 ⟶ 13:
'''Later-no-harm''' guarantees that the method will not use a voter's lower preferences to elect a candidate who that voter likes less than the candidate that would have been elected if this voter had kept his lower preferences a secret.
 
As a result, voters may feel free to vote their complete ranking of the candidates, which in turn may give the election method more complete information to use to find a winner. There is a tradeoff however, in that this criterion simultaneously minimizes the amount of information that the voting method can use to find a winner.
 
 
This criteria is equivalent to the criteria that the system is non-compramizingcompromising in that it will never elect a compromise or(i.e. a [[Utilitarian winner]]. Thisor insistence[[Condorcet onwinner]].) majoritarianismThis is not universally desired so it cannot be claimed that this criteria is always one which would be desirable to pass. If one wants a system which can elect a compromise winner then it would be desirable to fail this criteria.
 
It is believed that some methods fail LNH at higher rates than others. For example, [[Condorcet methods]] are expected to fail less often than something like [[Score voting]].
This criteria is equivalent to the criteria that the system is non-compramizing in that it will never elect a compromise or [[Utilitarian winner]]. This insistence on majoritarianism is not universally desired so it cannot be claimed that this criteria is always one which would be desirable to pass. If one wants a system which can elect a compromise winner then it would be desirable to fail this criteria.
 
<br />
'''Later-no-harm''' is incompatible with the [[Condorcet Criterion|Condorcet criterion]].
 
[[Category:Voting system criteria]]