MSDSV: Difference between revisions

SODA does well on 1,2,4, 5, and 6, and horribly on 3 and 7. MSV does well on 1,2,45, and 56, is OK on 3 and 4, and bad on 67. Approval does well on 1,3,45, and 67, is OK on 2, and bad on 4 and 56. MSDSV does well on 1,2,4,5, and 6, and is bad on 3 and 7. Various Condorcet-like methods (MAM, ICT, sorted approval methods) are good on 2, 4, and 6, but none as good as the aforementioned on 1, and all fail 3 and 7. MJ and other Bucklin methods are, as far as I can tell, dominated by MSV on all but 7. And other methods just don't compete. So, MSDSV is on the pareto frontier of the above criteria, which makes it a top-shelf method.