MSDSV: Difference between revisions

# Some arguable track record

SODA does well on 1,2,4, 5, and 6, and horribly on 3 and 7. MSV does well on 1,2,5, and 6, is OK on 3 and 4, and bad on 7. Approval does well on 1,3,5, and 7, is OK on 2, and bad on 4 and 6. MSDSV does well on 1,2,4,5, and 6, and is bad on 3 and 7. Various Condorcet-like methods (MAM, ICT, sorted approval methods) are good on 2, 4, and 6, but none as good as the aforementioned on 1, and all fail 3 and 7. MJ and other Bucklin methods are, as far as I can tell, dominated by MSV on all but 7. And other methods just don't compete. So, MSDSV is on the pareto frontier of the above criteria, which makes it a top-shelf method.