Majority Acceptable Score voting: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
imported>Homunq
No edit summary
imported>Homunq
No edit summary
Line 7:
# Highest points wins.
 
Step 2b probably doesn't matter, because any majority-supported candidate that exists would almost certainly win in step 4 anyway. But step 2b is part of Bucklin voting, which was used in over a dozen US cities during the Progressive era. Also, it lets you say the whole method in one sentence, ifusing the personidea you're talking to understandsof medians: "choose the highest score among the candidates with the highest median".
 
Here's a google spreadsheet to calculate results: [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1siFG6XmOZokygY-86EhAKgv8YwzKtTET6AJopyXRqu0/edit#gid=0]. On page 1, it has some examples of how different combinations of ratings would come out, suggesting that it could work well in both [[chicken dilemma]] and [[center squeeze]] scenarios. On page 2, it has some hypothetical results for the Egypt 2012 election, showing that this system could have elected a reformer over Morsi, despite vote-splitting among the various reformers. IRV could have elected Morsi. (Note: the spreadsheet does not actually check step 2b.)
Line 49:
!bgcolor="#fff"|Nashville
|bgcolor="#fff"|26
|bgcolor="#fff"|37
|bgcolor="#fff"|0
|bgcolor="#fff"|370
|bgcolor="#cfcfff"|27.474
|bgcolor="#bfbcfc"|9849.67
|bgcolor="#bfb"|76.3
|-
!bgcolor="#fff"|Chattanooga
|bgcolor="#fff"|15
|bgcolor="#fff"|3017
|bgcolor="#fff"|21
|bgcolor="#fff"|42
|bgcolor="#cfcfff"|49.926
|bgcolor="#fffcfc"|6559.17
|bgcolor="#fff"|37(75.7)
|-
!bgcolor="#fff"|Knoxville
|bgcolor="#fff"|17
|bgcolor="#fff"|2815
|bgcolor="#fff"|42
|bgcolor="#fff"|1326
|bgcolor="#fcc"|5259.87
|bgcolor="#fff"|(6477.27)
|}
</div>
Anonymous user