Anonymous user
Majority Choice Approval: Difference between revisions
→Criteria compliance
imported>Homunq |
imported>Homunq |
||
Line 43:
All of the methods are matrix-summable for counting at the precinct level. Only MCA-VR actually requires a matrix (or, possibly two counting rounds); the others require only O(N) tallies.
Thus, the method which satisfies the most criteria is MCA-AR, using [[Schulze]] to select one finalist and MCA-P to select the other. As a rated method (and thus one which fails Arrow's ranking-based Universality Criterion), this method is able to seem to "violate [[Arrow's theorem]]" by simultaneously satisfying monotonicity, the Condorcet criterion, and clone independence.
{{Tenn_voting_example}}
| |||