Majority Defeat Disqualification Approval: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
imported>KVenzke
mNo edit summary
imported>KVenzke
No edit summary
Line 15:
 
==Criteria==
'''MDDA''' satisfies the [[Favorite Betrayal criterion]], [[Strategy-Free criterion]], the [[Strong Defensive Strategy criterion]] (and [[Minimal Defense criterion]]), and [[Monotonicity criterion|monotonicity]], and (''check this'') the [[Plurality criterion]].
 
It fails [[Strategic nomination|Clone-Winner]], the [[Plurality criterion]], the [[Generalized Strategy-Free criterion]], the [[Condorcet criterion]], the [[Smith set|Smith criterion]], [[Participation criterion|Participation]], the [[Majority criterion|Majority criterion for solid coalitions]], and [[Later-no-harm criterion|Later-no-harm]].
 
==Links==
*[http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2005-June/016327.html Method is first proposed on EM, with properties proven (Jun 21 2005)]
*[http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2005-June/016334.html Mike Ossipoff names the method]
 
''Work in progress.''
 
[[Category:Single-winner voting systems]]
Anonymous user