electowiki

Majority Judgment: Difference between revisions

Page Discussion

Majority Judgment (view source)

Revision as of 05:45, 25 March 2020

139 bytes added ,  4 years ago
→‎Satisfied and failed criteria: Please use the talk page if you disagree with this edit.
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
(→‎Satisfied and failed criteria: Please use the talk page if you disagree with this edit.)
Line 11:
 
== Satisfied and failed criteria ==
Majority Judgment voting satisfies the [[Majority criterion for rated ballots|majority criterion]] for rated ballots]], a weak form of the [[mutual majority criterion]] (a majority giving only and all of their preferred candidates perfect grades will win), the [[monotonicity criterion]], [[reversal symmetry]], and [[later-no-harm|later-no-help]]. Assuming that ratings are given independently of other candidates, it satisfies the [[independence of clones criterion]] and the [[independence of irrelevant alternatives|independence of irrelevant alternatives criterion]]<ref>Badinski and Laraki, ''Majority Judgment'', p. 217</ref> - although this latter criterion is incompatible with the majority criterion if voters shift their judgments in order to express their [[preferential voting|preferences]] between the available candidates.
 
It fails the [[Condorcet criterion]],<ref>Strategically in the [[strong Nash equilibrium]], MJ passes the Condorcet criterion.</ref> [[later-no-harm]],<ref>MJ provides a weaker guarantee similar to LNH: rating another candidate at or below your preferred winner's median rating (as opposed to your own rating for the winner) cannot harm the winner.</ref> [[consistency criterion for voting systems|consistency]], the [[Condorcet method|Condorcet loser criterion]],<ref>Nevertheless, it passes a slightly weakened version, the majority condorcet loser criterion, in which all defeats are by an absolute majority (for instance, if there aren't equal rankings).</ref> and the [[participation criterion]].<ref>It can only fail the participation criterion when, among other conditions, the new ballot rates both of the candidates in question on the same side of the winning median, and the prior distribution of ratings is more sharply-peaked or irregular for one of the candidates.</ref> It also fails the ranked or preferential [[majority criterion]], which is incompatible with the passed criterion [[independence of irrelevant alternatives]].
Retrieved from "https://electowiki.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/9447"