Pairwise counting: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4:
Most, but not all, election methods that meet the [[Condorcet criterion]] or the [[Condorcet loser criterion]] use pairwise counting.<ref group=nb>[[Nanson's method|Nanson]] meets the [[Condorcet criterion]] and [[Instant-runoff voting]] meets the [[Condorcet loser criterion]].</ref> See the [[Pairwise counting#Condorcet|Condorcet section]] for more information on the use of pairwise counting in [[Condorcet methods]].
 
== Example without numbersExamples ==
 
=== Example without numbers ===
As an example, if pairwise counting is used in an election that has three candidates named A, B, and C, the following pairwise counts are produced:
 
Line 54 ⟶ 56:
Sometimes only the "dominance relation" (wins, losses, and ties) is shown, rather than the exact numbers. So for example, if A beat B in their pairwise matchup, it'd be possible to write "Win" (or a green checkmark) in the A>B cell and "Loss" (or a red X) in the B>A cell.
 
=== Example with numbers ===
 
{{Tenn_voting_example}}
Line 142 ⟶ 144:
|}
 
=== Example using various ballot types ===
 
[See [[:File:Pairwise counting procedure.png|File:Pairwise_counting_procedure.png]] for an image explaining all of this).