Anonymous user
Prefer Accept Reject voting: Difference between revisions
→Favorite betrayal?
imported>Homunq |
imported>Homunq |
||
Line 53:
However, there are several ways to "rescue" FBC-like behavior for this system.
# Each candidate either comes from one of no more than 3 "ideological categories", or is "nonviable".
Line 64:
If the above restrictions hold, then PAR voting would meet FBC. It is arguably likely that real-world voting scenarios will meet the above restrictions, except for a negligible fraction of "ideologically atypical" voters. For instance, in the first scenario above, the categories appear to be {XA}, {B}, and {C}, so the B>AC voters would probably actually vote either B>A or B>C.
== An example ==
|