Proportional representation: Difference between revisions

clarifying grammar
No edit summary
(clarifying grammar)
Line 1:
{{Wikipedia}}
 
'''Proportional Representation''' ('''PR''') is a measure of the outcome of an election where there are multiple parties and multiple membermembers are electionelected. It is one of many [[types of representation]] in a [[W:Representative government|representative government]].
 
In practice, thisthe usuallyimplementation involves ensuring that [[W:Political party|political parties]] in parliament or legislative assemblies receive a number of seats (approximately) proportional to the percentage of vote they received throughby making use of a [[Partisan systems|partisan system]]. One system which achieves high levels of proportional representation is the [[Party-list proportional representation|party-list proportional representation]]. Another kind of electoral system that strives to achieve proportional representation but which does not rely on the existence of political parties is the [[single transferable vote]] (STV). Some electoral systems, such as the [[single non-transferable vote]] and [[Reweighted score voting]] are sometimes categorized as "semi-proportional". A "semi-proportional" system is made of several [[Regional Systems | regional]] districts with each of which passing some measure of [[Proportional Representation]].
 
== Measures ==
 
There are several metrics which are used to define Proportional Representation explicitly. A well-accepted form is the [[W:Gallagher index|Gallagher index]], which measures the difference between the percentage of votes each party gets and the percentage of seats each party gets in the resulting legislature, and itaggregates alsoacross measuresall thisparties disproportionalityto from allgive partiesa ''collectively''total measure in any one given election result. ThatThis collectivemeasure disproportionalityattributes froma thespecific electionlevel isor given[[Proportional Representation]] to a precisegiven score,election which can then be used in comparing various levels of proportionality among various elections from various [[W:Electoral systems|electoralVoting systemssystem]]s.
 
[[W:Michael Gallagher (academic)|Michael Gallagher]], who created the index, referred to it as a "least squares index", inspired by the residual sum of squares used in the method of least squares. The index is therefore commonly abbreviated as "LSq" even though the measured allocation is not necessarily a least squares fit. The Gallagher index is computed by taking the [[W:Square root|square root]] of half the [[W:Summation|sum]] of the squares of the difference between percent of votes (<math>V_i</math>) and percent of seats (<math>S_i</math>) for each of the political parties (<math>i=1,\ldots,n</math>).
Line 119:
 
In addition, maximizing the natural log favors small parties a little too much to pass proportional criteria and when a voter’s satisfaction is zero is just the most extreme example of that. The partial sums of the harmonic series equation does however pass the proportional criteria that a maximization of the natural log can’t. I personally think that the partial sums of the harmonic series are better for determining the winners of an election, but the natural log of summed utilities is a better tool for measuring proportionality in computer simulations even if those simulations are skewed to representing small parties too much (which may or may not be a bad thing).
== See Also ==
 
* [[Vote splitting]]
* [[Proportionate Representation]]
* [[Ideal Representation]]
 
 
== Further reading ==
765

edits