Proposed Statutory Rules for DMC: Difference between revisions

→‎Article 3: two-candidate case was redundant, removed it
imported>Araucaria
m (→‎Article 3: change `first, second ^and^ third place' to `first, second ^or^ third place')
imported>Araucaria
(→‎Article 3: two-candidate case was redundant, removed it)
Line 14:
# Suppose that there is no Instant Round Robin winner; that an elimination stage of determining the Definitive Majority Choice winner cannot take place because two or more candidates are tied for lowest approval rating; and that the approval rating tie cannot be resolved using standard election recount procedures --- for example, some candidates may have received unanimous 100% approval or 0% approval. Then,
## If any of the tied least-approved candidates is pairwise defeated by another higher-approved candidate not tied for lowest approval rating, each such least-approved candidate shall be eliminated.
## Otherwise, if there are only two tied least-approved candidates, and one pairwise defeats the other, the pairwise loser shall be eliminated.
## Otherwise, eliminate the candidate with the lowest number of
### total ballots ranking that candidate in first or second place.
Anonymous user